|
|
Post by anklepick on Feb 13, 2012 8:48:42 GMT -5
There has been a lot of talk about strength in sectionals, and I agree the west is not very deep. However, I believe as a coach I could put together a lineup from the west that would be very hard to beat. As in a match I would move some kids around to get the best matchups for the team. Here is what I might go with: 106 Galentine-Montgomery 113 Killian-Canton 120 Pearson-Montoursvile 126 Gipe-South Williamsport 132 Kramer-Montgomery 138 Batkowski-Montoursville 145 Porter-Milton 152 Preisch-Milton 160 Schnyder-Montgomery 170 English-Milton 182 Wesneski-Canton 195 Route-Canton 220 Smith-Lewisburg 285 Solomon-Milton Depending on matchups some could be switched around and others could be added in such as Ostrowski, Pepper, Goetz, McCracken and etc. Nice to dream a little.  |
|
|
|
Post by 3ringcircus on Feb 13, 2012 9:10:25 GMT -5
Not a bad line up, but at 182 Ostrowski beat Wesneski when Lewisburg wrestled Canton.
|
|
|
|
Post by matbrat on Feb 13, 2012 10:11:52 GMT -5
Here is a North Line Up. I am going by what I am hearing as far as weights also.
106 Hamlin - Williamson
113 Kelley - Wyalusing
120 Everett - Williamson
126 Barnes - Williamson
132 Hart - Wyalusing
138 Green/Kuntz
145 Ripic - Towanda
152 Fenton - Wyalusing or Champulavier up
160 Colton - Troy
170 Frankenfield - Wyalusing
182 Clark - Wyalusing
195 Daugherty - Wellsboro
220 Stettler/Otis
285 Force/Kriner/Worthington
|
|
|
|
Post by marauder on Feb 13, 2012 12:01:01 GMT -5
Do you really think that Champulavier is going 152 and Ripic to 147....seriously  |
|
|
|
Post by Wildcat on Feb 13, 2012 14:11:16 GMT -5
This post has given me a great idea (at least in my mind). Why don’t we try to start a “Fantasy Section” league next year? Each week (Sunday evening) we could pick a team of 14 wrestlers from our sections to “wrestle” for that week and challenge one of the other sections each week. If I took north, 3 other people would have to agree to input a team every Sunday for their respective sections. You could pick any wrestler at the 14 weight classes from your section. Every match each wrestler wrestled that week would be counted toward his total points (Hint: If a team in your section is wrestling 2 duals and a tourney in a week, you might want to pick a stud or 2 from that team).
Schedule:
Week 1- North v South, East v West
Week 2- North v East, South v West
Week 3- North v West, South v East
Week 4- See Week 1
Until the end of Week12. That’s mid February if we start in week 2 of the regular season. Starting in week 2 gives us an idea of who is wrestling and at what weight. All scores will be taken from High School Scorebook when input (so don’t expect results for your team until Wednesday of each week.
Scoring:
Loss = 0
Dec = 1
MD = 2
TF = 3
Fall = 4
FF = 0 (This will prevent “coaches” from going for the easy points)
If 2 wrestlers on opposing fantasy teams wrestle “head to head” during the week you will earn 3x the points. Example below
Loss = 0
Dec = 3
MD = 6
TF = 9
Fall = 12
To get the points listed above your wrestler would have to wrestle the weight class above, at or below the weight you choose for him to wrestle that week (So, putting Smith from Lewisburg at 182 would get you nothing if he won at 220).
Just a little idea I have rattling around in my head. What do you all think?
|
|
|
|
Post by iwilltiltyou on Feb 13, 2012 18:07:38 GMT -5
Haha, that is an awesome idea. Following my fantasy players in football every Sunday gives me something extra to do, I think this would allow people to become more familiar with wrestlers across d4.
|
|
|
|
Post by anklepick on Feb 13, 2012 20:10:01 GMT -5
I just wouldn't want it to put any extra pressure on the kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by iwilltiltyou on Feb 13, 2012 20:21:34 GMT -5
I just wouldn't want it to put any extra pressure on the kids. This is also a very good point as indeed I'm sure the kids do read this forum and would feel pressure to perform. |
|
ntlfan
Junior Member
Posts: 52
|
Post by ntlfan on Feb 13, 2012 21:13:59 GMT -5
I think Barnes from Williamson is going 132, and also thought Pearson is at 115
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildcat on Feb 14, 2012 8:31:26 GMT -5
I just wouldn't want it to put any extra pressure on the kids. This is also a very good point as indeed I'm sure the kids do read this forum and would feel pressure to perform. We could e-mail our teams to each other and post the results on here at the end of the week. That way the kids won't know who we picked at the start of any week and they won't be pressured by our choices. |
|
