|
|
Post by D4wrestling on Feb 16, 2012 21:42:18 GMT -5
South Pairings
SOUTH SECTION
At Mifflinburg Intermediate School
Participating teams and Key: Danville (DA); East Juniata (EJ); Line Mountain (LM); <idd-West (MW); Mifflinburg (MF); Mount Carmel (MC); Shamokin (SH) and Southern Columbia (SC).
106: Noah Kuba, MF, bye. Cameron Newman, LM, vs. Kevin Smeltzer, DA. Shane Gudonis, MC, vs. Brett Shepard, SC. Corey Stauffer, MW, vs. Stephon Hartmann, EJ.
113: David Sheesley, MF, bye. Dalton Stump, DA, vs. Brendin Pancher, MC. Blake Carl, LM, bye. Isaac Stringer, MW, bye.
120: Brett Long, SH, vs. Cole Walter, MF. Joseph Hannon, DA, vs. Richie Gilson, EJ. Mark Harner, LM, vs. Michael Saukaitis, MC. Kent Lane, SC, vs. Tanner Ebright, MW.
126: Addison Zakarian, DA, vs. Mason Zimmerman, LM. Chris Sheaffer, MW, vs. Luis Martinez, SH. Dylan Feltman, EJ, vs. Justin Janovich, SC. Clark Wagner, MF, vs. Troy Tafner, MC.
132: Connor Houseknecht, SC, vs. Seth Lansberry, LM. Stephen Rosini, DA, vs. Adam Barrick, EJ. Blake Panko, MC, vs. Dane Shovlin, SH. Zach Heeter, MW, vs. Brendon Hicks, MF.
138: Sean Heggs, EJ, bye. Tyler Wariki, MC, vs. Dalton Zerbe, MW. Diego Otero, SC, vs. Travis Bordner, DA. Alan Miller, MF, vs. Theo Deptula, SH.
145: Adam Kritzer, LM, bye. Zeke Zsido, MC, vs. Thad Burke, SC. Dan Danowsky, MF, vs. Jared Benner, EJ. Tommy Moyer, DA, vs. Ty Fisher, SH.
152: Chris Trawitz, MW, bye. Britton Heim, LM, vs. David Fishburn, EJ. Eric Dock, MF, vs. Daniel Fletcher, MC. David Burke, DA, vs. Zach Tillett, SH.
160: Ty Walter, MF, bye. Damon Gearhart, DA, vs. Dylan Ehrenzeller, EJ. Dylan Eck, SC, vs. Meyrick Lamb, MC. Cody Rebuck, LM, bye.
170: Brett Przekop, MC, bye. Ryan Gessner, MF, vs. Zach Klingler, MW. Tyrell Lease, EJ, vs. Erik Smeltz, LM. Josiah Stahl, SH, vs. Steven Burke, DA.
182: Aaron Shrawder, MF, bye. Cody Haupt, MC, vs. Noah Wicks, EJ. Gunnar Feldmann, DA, vs. Mike Yucha, SH. Kenny Rothermel, LM, vs. Ben Clark, SC.
195: Matt Moore, SC, bye. Cristen Howerter, MC, vs. Wyatt Ebright, MW. John Punako, MF, vs. Rayce Boyer, LM. Dalton Rowe, EJ, vs. Zach Biddiscombe, SH.
220: Brody Hetrick, MW, vs. Jake Becker, SC. Chris Bennage, DA, vs. Trent Buckley, EJ. Mike Zosh, SH, vs. Anthony Peipher, LM. Derek Urbanavage, MC, vs. Yost Dillon, MF.
285: Nazar Mironenko, MF, bye. Seth Stablewski, MC, vs. Cameron Pensyl, SH. Joey Berkheimer, EJ, vs. Trent Donlan, SC. Jake Heintzelman, MW, bye.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildcat on Feb 16, 2012 21:43:41 GMT -5
Pretty sad that there are only 5 kids at 182 and 6 at 195 and a lot of kids sitting in the stands from 126 to 145 because they can't get a spot this year. Any one who looks at these brackets that voted for this change should be ashamed of themselves. The North has always been loaded in the light middle and I see the west is about the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by blackpantherfan on Feb 16, 2012 22:04:29 GMT -5
Pretty sad that there are only 5 kids at 182 and 6 at 195 and a lot of kids sitting in the stands from 126 to 145 because they can't get a spot this year. Any one who looks at these brackets that voted for this change should be ashamed of themselves. The North has always been loaded in the light middle and I see the west is about the same. its not fair just to pick on the heavier weights, look at all 4 sections, the first 2 lightweights, 106 and 113 arent very filled as well, |
|
thinkiknowitall
Full Member
"I shoot , I score. He shoots, I score" gable
Posts: 123
|
Post by thinkiknowitall on Feb 16, 2012 22:12:24 GMT -5
Eliminate sectionals. Just a PIAA money maker. End of story. Top 8 from districts top 4 from district 2
|
|
|
|
Post by blackpantherfan on Feb 16, 2012 22:17:21 GMT -5
I agree, sectionals are almost a waste of time, only 1 weight class out of 14 in the north has all 9 kids, none in the east,
|
|
|
|
Post by lbgpop on Feb 16, 2012 22:32:16 GMT -5
Not only that, but the kids from each section have already established a pecking order within their section because they wrestle each other. Sectionals become redundant for the most part.
I'd rather see them do away with Sectionals and replace it with an All Star dual meet between the 4 sections. I think it would be much more interesting.
|
|
m2182
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by m2182 on Feb 17, 2012 1:23:21 GMT -5
I agree, sectionals are almost a waste of time, only 1 weight class out of 14 in the north has all 9 kids, none in the east, In the east 138lbs has 9, there is nothing wrong with sectionals it gives some of the marginal wrestlers a chance at a medal they might not have a chance at at districts, in a way it is the first few rounds of districts. By having sectionals it also reduces the time and distance traveled not only for the wrestlers but the families. If they only had districts it would have to be at least a day longer. |
|
|
|
Post by blackpantherfan on Feb 17, 2012 4:48:05 GMT -5
They could get the tourney done in 2 days, there are holiday tournaments that have more teams then what we have in districts, and they get done in 2 days, it would have to be a Sat/Sun
|
|
|
|
Post by matbrat on Feb 17, 2012 7:34:29 GMT -5
Pretty sad that there are only 5 kids at 182 and 6 at 195 and a lot of kids sitting in the stands from 126 to 145 because they can't get a spot this year. Any one who looks at these brackets that voted for this change should be ashamed of themselves. The North has always been loaded in the light middle and I see the west is about the same. its not fair just to pick on the heavier weights, look at all 4 sections, the first 2 lightweights, 106 and 113 arent very filled as well, I think what is meant here is that the elimination of a middle weight and the expansion of the upper weights has left some good wrestlers in the lower weights out of some line ups. I see some teams that have lower weight guys displaced into other weights, whereas, if the weights would have been left alone, 119 thru 145 would've had some more talent throughout. Looking at the upper weight added, IMO, it did not help wrestling in general. The most numbers are in the middle-lower weights. |
|
|
|
Post by lancelot on Feb 17, 2012 7:46:45 GMT -5
I think it's going to take a few yrs for the heavywts. to fill in with good quality wrestlers. Like nature taking its course the kids will now lift more and not be so conscientious of their wt. when they are only 9-10th graders trying to get into the varsity lineup. 215 was weak when they initially put it in but it filled out nicely the last 7-10 yrs.
|
|
|
|
Post by freestyle31 on Feb 17, 2012 8:54:23 GMT -5
Where would they hold Districts at,if they got rid of sectionals?Would be to big for Williamsports cellar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildcat on Feb 17, 2012 11:07:26 GMT -5
Pretty sad that there are only 5 kids at 182 and 6 at 195 and a lot of kids sitting in the stands from 126 to 145 because they can't get a spot this year. Any one who looks at these brackets that voted for this change should be ashamed of themselves. The North has always been loaded in the light middle and I see the west is about the same. its not fair just to pick on the heavier weights, look at all 4 sections, the first 2 lightweights, 106 and 113 arent very filled as well, BPF, do you have a chemical imbalance? How did I pick on the heavy weights? I was making a point that the decision to remove a weight class from an historically populated range of weights to a less populated weight range was assinine. I would be saying the same if they took away 135 to create a 95lb class. I don't claim to know a better way, but I do know that the numbers showed this to be a stupid idea in PA. |
|
|
|
Post by matbrat on Feb 17, 2012 12:12:02 GMT -5
its not fair just to pick on the heavier weights, look at all 4 sections, the first 2 lightweights, 106 and 113 arent very filled as well, BPF, do you have a chemical imbalance? How did I pick on the heavy weights? I was making a point that the decision to remove a weight class from an historically populated range of weights to a less populated weight range was assinine. I would be saying the same if they took away 135 to create a 95lb class. I don't claim to know a better way, but I do know that the numbers showed this to be a stupid idea in PA. Right on Wildcat. I say we combine 82 and 95 by making the weight classs 190, and then add (give back) another weight class in the range between 132 and 152. This is where the most wrestlers are by the numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by wrestlingmomfan on Feb 17, 2012 12:40:10 GMT -5
I am new to wrestling and so I dont really know much about sectionals etc... How many wrestlers in each weight bracket advance to next week?...Thanks for the answer in advance
|
|
